I suppose that I am most passionate
about discovering new things. I travel a fair amount, especially in the U.S.,
giving talks and attending conferences. One of the most delightful aspects of
this roaming is the chance to learn about other places. Recently I flew into
Toledo, Ohio to give an address at the University there. I have been in other
Ohio cities - Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Columbus – but never in Toledo. It was
cloudless afternoon when I flew in and, because I request a window seat so I
can peer down at the landscape below, I was amazed to see so many of the homes
on the rural outskirts of the city with ponds in their yards. Not swimming
pools but ponds. All shapes and sizes. There were large bodies of water with
homes ringing their shores but there were also uncountable number of separate
properties with one home on it and a back or side area featuring a pond. It
made me wonder about the ecology of the region (Toledo abuts the shore of Lake
Erie) and the use put to those ponds (ornamental? fishing? even swimming?) It
was a question I would have to put to my hosts when I arrived.
When a guest, I am often lodged in
a generic conference hotel but, if given the opportunity, I will choose a more
off-the-beaten-path lodging or at least try to walk the nearby neighborhood and
scout out its unique stores, homes, landmarks, inhabitants and particularities.
Another place I have had opportunity to visit recently is New Orleans, where I
stayed in a somewhat long-in-the-tooth but historic inn which allowed me to
amble through the French Quarter each morning on my way to the conference gathering
and do a tour of my own through the storied district with its layers of
history: the Old Ursuline Convent, the Cathedral with its prominent tableaux of
France’s King Louis, the Creole restaurant where Andrew Jackson dined and I
enjoyed the mufalatta. Each unique
environment has its own history and feel, its own natural and cultural ecology,
its sense of the “place.” This fascinates me.
As a teacher and a scholar I
suppose the same curiosity about things I don’t know drives my work. One of my
main areas of academic research is Salesian spirituality (the tradition founded
in the 17th century by St. Francis de Sales) and I never tire of
being asked to delve deeper into that tradition to ferret out new perspectives
and ask unasked questions. More recently I have completed a study of Marian
devotion in the “minority majority” archdiocese of Los Angeles, which
incidentally is my home town. The research took me all over the vast southern
California ecclesial environment and allowed me to speak with all sorts of
people I never would otherwise have met: priests, religious, and sacristans,
yes, but also members of rosary groups and sodalities of Our Lady, ordinary Catholics
who taught me of their devotion to Mary in her many guises: Vietnamese,
Filipino, Korean, Chinese, Mexican, Guatemalan, Honduran, Polish, Lithuanian,
Nigerian, and Salvadoran.
At Creighton I especially enjoy
students who ask a lot of questions, not that I always know the answers, but I
appreciate the restless intellectual energy that motivates the questions and delight
in the play involved in turning the question over and seeing how things look
when viewed through the lens of a probing inquiry. The “what do I have to know
for the exam” questions, while I can appreciate the often anxious motive behind
them, are not the ones that most interest me. Rather, I delight in a student
who finds connections between a topic we are pursuing in Theology and something
read in a Psychology text or heard in a History lecture, or some observation
they have made through their own experience, or some cross cultural encounter
they have had. These forays into the world of ideas are not unlike my own
roaming in unfamiliar cities: ancient or recent pathways traversed with new
steps, seen with new eyes and sensibilities and a zest for wonder. These are
the things that give life and generate passion.
Kindly,
Dr. Wendy M. Wright, Theology
Friday, April 5, 2013
Friday, March 22, 2013
Celebrating Our History
I am delighted
to be writing during Women’s History Month.
Communities across America celebrate the accomplishments of women who
beat the odds to blaze the trails that make it possible for us to live self-determined,
authentic lives. We gather to draw
inspiration from the lives of great women like Alice Paul, Shirley Chisolm,
Kateri Tekakwitha, Dolores Huerta, Dorothy Day, Sojourner Truth, Patsy Mink,
and Wilma Rudolph (and many, many others). Then, on April 1, our conception of “history”
takes its regular shape and we look forward to celebrating more women from eras
past when March comes again.
Kindly,
Dr. Heather Fryer
Professor, Department of History and
Women's & Gender Studies
At least as
wonderful as these histories is the unbounded admiration that we give these women
for their accomplishments. There’s no instantaneous accounting of how
much makeup Amelia Earhart wore. There’s
no attempt to downgrade the courage of Susan B. Anthony or Eleanor Roosevelt in
proportion to any support they may have received from men. There’s no asterisk next to
Queen Liliuokalani's name to indicate that she could not have made her strong stand against imperialism if she hadn't come from a powerful family. We don’t compulsively slap labels like “girly
girl,” “sell-out” or “man-hater” on Elizabeth Blackwell, Ella Baker, Rachel
Carson, Victoria Woodhull, Abigail Adams, or Sandra Day O’Connor.
There are some
who suggest that such conversations about contemporary women emanate from a well
of aggression hidden deep within the hearts of women. But these are not conversations of the heart.
They are reactions to the pressures of
our own historical moment. In the
1970s-1990s women dreamed of “having it all.”
As this vision evolves into an expectation, we find ourselves juggling family,
education/career, and community life. Not
only must we never drop a ball, we are to look, feel, and simply be fabulous while keeping everything
aloft.
Some women are
reckoning with the fact that “having it all” may be more struggle than juggle. Many of us, years into our own attempts to “do
it all,” find ourselves making on-the-spot decisions about what we really can
and cannot pull off in the narrow span of time between high school graduation
and late middle age (with only twenty-four hours in each day in that interval).
Anxiety and fear are the foes of wisdom
and compassion. Every projection or
judgment about whether a juggler’s costume is cut sexy or dowdy, or gets extra practice time by being “careeristly
childless,” or receives unearned praise for “just” being a mother is a lost
opportunity for the kind of mutual support and solidarity that could bring an
end to the whole exhausting performance.
As in every
historical era, women are making history with everything that they give life
to, whether babies, ideas, artworks, collaborations, movements, conversations, communities,
homes, cultures, celebrations, or relationships. We’re all in this era together (men, too!)
and whether it’s at the forefront of our consciousness or not, we are creating the
stuff of the Women’s History Months of the future. So why wait?—Let’s celebrate the history that
we are making together every day!
Kindly,
Dr. Heather Fryer
Professor, Department of History and
Women's & Gender Studies
Monday, March 18, 2013
A Tribute to Dr. Anne Scheerer
I write this tribute to one of Creighton’s most remarkable
women to urge that SOMEONE here do something to keep her memory alive.
Dr. Anne
Scheerer, retired dean of summer sessions and lifelong learning, died recently.
It’s not surprising that her death has received little attention since she had
outlived most of her contemporaries and had Alzheimer’s. The shrunken woman
trying to remember something someone had just told her was a far cry from the dynamo
I met as a young reporter in the early 1970’s.
Anne taught
mathematics before becoming one of Creighton’s first women administrators. As a
dean, she took Creighton into the community with seminars and non-credit
classes that benefitted many, including women trying to figure out new roles. I
think I met her on the Mayor’s Commission on the Status of Women that worked to
open doors to women. Along with people like Eileen Lieben and Mary Higgins
(yes, the Mary Higgins who still works in retention), she helped transform the role
of women in the University and inspired many outside of Creighton. In 1987, she
received the Mary Lucretia Creighton Award.
What I
remember best about Anne, however, was the way she spent her first years of
retirement. Instead of relaxing, she joined first the Papal Volunteers then the
Peace Corps, serving in various Third World locations. She sent back detailed
descriptions of her adventures including bicycling on the Great Wall of China. What
a woman!
Sadly time and
illness caught up with Anne but good friends like Sister Mary Alice Haley,
retired philosophy professor, patiently took her to community events. I would
wish that Anne rest in peace but she would hate that. Instead I’ll hope that
her eternity finds her as energetic as she was in life.
Isn’t it time to permanently
memorialize this Creighton pioneer who did so much for so many? How about a Dr.
Anne Scheerer Outstanding Retiree Award?
Kindly,
Dr. Eileen Wirth
Friday, February 22, 2013
Run For Your Life
A few weeks ago I watched
a documentary entitled Run for Your Life
by Judd Ehrlich and was introduced to a man by the name of Fred Lebow. Fred
started the New York City Marathon in 1970; a race that started with 55 runners
and now boasts over 45,000 runners and is one of the biggest and most
prestigious events in the running world. Fred challenged the running community
to think differently about running in three significant ways—all of which have
created a culture which allows me to be the running enthusiast I am today. The
first was challenging New Yorkers to allow the race course to touch all five Burroughs
in NYC. There was a lot of crime in one Burroughs during that time and runners
were not interested in risking their safety in the name of fairness; but Fred
challenged this mentality proving to everyone that avoiding dangerous
neighborhoods would not grow the sport.
The second was the
introduction of the first ever all women’s running event, the Crazy Legs Mini
Marathon, in Central Park. When businesses heard about Fred’s courageous
attempts with the marathon they wanted a piece of the action. Women’s distance
running was unheard of in these days. I recently read a story in Runner’s World (RW) magazine about Katherine
Switzer, the first woman to enter and complete the Boston Marathon. Katherine
recounts to RW that in the late 1960’s when she started running she used to get
stopped by the police when out on runs—they had assumed there was no reason for
a woman to be running unless she had broken the law. Fred not only created the
Mini Marathon for women only but he also allowed women to enter the NYC
marathon as equals with men.
The third thing that Fred did was probably the
least significant to most but it spoke volumes to me. When Fred began running,
he ran a mile and a half in 20 minutes. That’s 13.20 minutes per mile. Most
able bodied college students could walk a mile in this time. Fred finished the
first NYC marathon in 45th place out of 55 runners. Fred didn’t seem
intimidated by his lack of speed at all. He courageously pursued his dream of
growing the running culture in as many ways as possible, despite the fact that
he couldn’t keep up with any of his friends let alone the running greats of
that time. How did Fred do this? How did he get two Olympic marathoners to agree
to run in the first 5 Burrough NYC Marathon? How did he generate a buzz about
the race that encouraged exponential growth each year? How did he serve as the
race director when he was consistently a few steps ahead of the slack wagon (a
vehicle which follows the last runners in a race and picks them up if they’ve
decided to quit or have become incapacitated)?
It’s Fred’s slower speed that is the biggest takeaway for me. I’m not
good at many things; if I were to compare my ACT scores with my friends and
students I’d be at the lower end, if I were to prepare a meal some part of it
would be over or undercooked, and if I were to run a marathon (hypothetically
in Lincoln, NE this May) I can guarantee that I’ll finish in the bottom half.
But I’m gonna try. I’m gonna lace up every other day for the next 2 and a half
months and I’m gonna chip away at this big goal. In the spirit of Fred Lebow,
what goal are you courageously pursuing regardless of your skill level?
Kindly,
Mandi Hulme
Resident Director, Kiewit Hall
Monday, February 18, 2013
Cura Personalis: A Way of Being
Hi Everyone,
Kindly,
Joan Mueller
Professor of Theology
Lately I’ve been thinking about how cura personalis is not only about doing but also a way of being in
the world. Back in the day, we used to talk a lot about “the care of souls.”
What this meant is that we tried to be mindful of the “Godfulness” of every
person who we met in our day. Lately, this way of being in the world, this way
of meeting every person in my day with awe and deep, reverential respect is
becoming very alive for me. When I meet my students, I see the beauty of their
characters, dreams, and spirits. When I meet the people in my apartment
building, I respect the wonder of their lives and their clear wisdom. When I
engage the sisters within my Franciscan community, I appreciate their inner joy,
carefree spirits and trusted friendship.
I guess that what I am saying is that we can be “women and
men for others” simply by opening our eyes moment by moment. As we meet each
other every day, let us understand that each person is the dwelling place of God—God
coming to us. If we open our eyes within our dorms, classrooms and departments,
we will certainly also see and serve the poor, lonely and disenfranchised in
our world.
Kindly,
Professor of Theology
Friday, February 8, 2013
In Good Company
At Creighton University, women of substance flourish
in many circumstances when they bring their love of God and others to bear on
their actions. Since coming to Creighton in 1997, I have been astounded by the
compassion, commitment, and contributions of women who embrace wholeheartedly
their relationship with the God of love Who calls them to respond to those in
need. This is especially noteworthy when the very structures women find
themselves part of do not always reflect or support women’s perspectives,
women’s wisdom, and women’s preferred ways of relating. Women do not often
characterize their work in the world as “tackling problems that need to be
solved,” but as embracing those in need, and walking with others as companions
on a journey. Women often excel at networking and inclusion, preferring
companionship and constructive conversation to climbing, jockeying for position,
or domination in a discussion. They listen carefully and value others’
feelings, even if doing so takes more time at a meeting. They ground their work
in collaborative circles, gleaning their self-worth from the love they engender
rather than from their positions within the pyramidic structures that
characterize academic institutions. They often eschew titles and distinctions
if these place them above others in their company, and will often reach to the
fringes to serve the good of the marginalized. If they do get “caught” in the
ever-collapsing and re-erected hierarchical ladders, they often try to weave
webs of compassion to cushion the fall of those who might be harmed along the
way. The best are able to navigate the high wires like trapeze artists, caring
more for those who are grasping for their hands than for the adulation of the
audience. Look around at the astounding women of Creighton, and behold their
magnificence!
Women who are groundskeepers, professors
in the humanities or business, administrative assistants, distinguished chair holders, directors of academic and service-learning programs, housekeeping and food service professionals, academic deans and vice presidents, research professors in the healing arts, nurse practitioners, coordinators of student organizations and activities, directors of programs for students with special needs, student leaders, athletic trainers, and campus ministers all have one thing in common: they live “a faith that does justice.” They look out for the least. They cherish, nurture and protect life in all its forms. They seek the God of love in the depths of human despair, and do not recoil from suffering. As women who often bear most of the responsibility of home-making, raising children, and reaching out to those in need, besides their full-time service at the University, the faith-filled women of Creighton imitate our foundresses, Mary Lucretia and Sarah Emily Creighton, by finding a way to bring hope and help to their larger “family,” the Omaha community, and the world. What gets them out of bed in the morning and keeps them motivated? Where do they find their courage, strength, and resilience? They are children of the God Who is love. I am so grateful to be in their company.
Kindly,
Dr. Laura Weber
Director, Campus Ministry
Professor, Theology Department
Friday, February 1, 2013
Creighton Ruined Me...
Let me
explain before you think "uhh why is she writing about Creighton if she
hates it?"
My
feelings for my experience at Creighton University are the furthest from hate.
In fact, that's why Creighton ruined me. Many of you have probably heard it
tossed around in regards to how once the Jesuit values are entrenched in your
value system, you're ruined for life. You can't turn a blind eye to the
injustices in the world, you always strive for Magis, and you attempt to care
for the whole person. Not to mention you can't imagine just living for
yourself, but rather "for and with others." Never again will you
wonder what "AMDG" means, and I bet that in your job after
graduation, you will be able to name more Jesuits than professors.
These
sentiments and more are the best way to characterize the transformation that
occurred in me through my time at Creighton. I can't even believe that I am a
second semester senior who's time is almost up.
When I
first got accepted to CU, I was looking primarily at schools closer to my
hometown of Portland, Maine. The prospect of going to a school in Omaha,
Nebraska (a place I had never been and didn't have ANY connections to) was
terrifying. In fact, all logic told me not to go. My family is all on the East
Coast, from Maine to Florida. I have connections throughout the New England
states that would have provided me with internships and other building blocks
for the future. Not to mention the ocean. Growing up 3 minutes away from the
Atlantic is quite different than living 3 minutes away from what I respectfully
refer to the Missouri River as: "chocolate milk."
But when
I opened up my Creighton acceptance and found this quote on the front, you
could say that my mind was made up.
"A
university that will challenge you. A community that will embrace you. An
experience that will change you."
So I did
the naturally logical thing and accepted the invitation to go to a college
1,700 miles away where I knew absolutely no one. Yep.
I'm a
quotes freak so I remember a major "oooh, ahhh" that I thought when I
saw the tight writing. But over my time here, I really have come to realize
that Creighton meant it when they said it. Even if it started as creative
marketing copy, Creighton University really came through on this claim. I have
been challenged, most definitely - both in and out of the classroom. I have
been embraced more than I ever thought possible. And yes, I've sure been
changed. So maybe that's a better way to say it than ruined, but whatever way
you say it, it's true. And I couldn't be happier about it.
Kindly,
Christina Moore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




